| |
Search videos for NeoCon |
|
|
|
|
AIPAC and NeoCon Policy
A Clean Break
http://www.tinyurl.com/2mnptm
http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot.com/2008/02/clean-break.html
AIPAC and NeoCon Policy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1bm2GPoFfg
(What motivated the 9/11 hijackers? See testimony most didn't)
See Call-In In Depth with Jimmy Carter
C-SPAN, BookTV He responds to a caller who asks questions concerning pressure put on the US political system and the resulting support of Israel.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBJgaBe5NgM
Call-In In Depth with Jimmy Carter
C-SPAN, BookTV
He answers a question about the paper "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy" by John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbapmPR0ZeQ
The NeoCon Agenda:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4MdyJDnSoI
Length: 147
Rating: 4.60 (179 ratings)
Tags: Israel AIPAC NeoCon Congress Iran
|
Play |
|
|
War Crime Sold By Neocon Deception, IMPEACH NOW!
http://tinyurl.com/47nxq8
http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2008/06/war-crime-sold-by-neocon-deception.html
http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2008/06/war-crime-sold-by-neocon-deception_06.html
Hear James's full call here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3XBUbVhNx8&feature=PlayList&p=7E41C0ADDA1EDCDC&index=0&playnext=1
Neocons Perle, Feith, Libby and others pushed for Iraq War
neocons neocon Richard Perle Douglas Feith David Wurmser Bush Cheney illegal Iraq War Arnaud de Borchgrave
Length: 96
Rating: 4.90 (369 ratings)
Tags: neocons neocon Richard Perle Douglas Feith David Wurmser Bush Cheney illegal Iraq War Arnaud de Borchgrave
|
Play |
|
|
WeAreChangeLA member is attacked by Neo-Con David Frum
WeAreChangeLA's Stewart Howe asks some tough questions of Neo-Con David Frum, author and speechwriter credited with the "Axis of Evil" phrase, at the LA Times/UCLA Festival Of Books on Saturday April 26th. David Frum responds with profane suggestions and Frum demonstrates the violent nature of the Neocons by hitting Mr. Howe and his camera no less then three times. Mr. Frum apparently thinks that it is acceptable behavior to attack people who ask questions.
9-11.meetup.com/359
infowars.com
wearechange.org
Stewart Howe de WeAreChangeLA pregunta algunas preguntas duras de David Frum Neo-Con, el autor y speechwriter acreditaron con el "Eje de la Mal" la frase, en el Festival de Tiempos/UCLA de LA De Libros el sábado 26 de abril. David Frum responde con sugerencias de profano y Frum demuestra la naturaleza violenta del Neo-Cons golpeando a Sr. Howe y su cámara no menos entonces tres veces. El Sr. Frum piensa aparentemente que es la conducta aceptable atacar a personas que hacen preguntas.
Length: 486
Rating: 4.70 (255 ratings)
Tags: first ammendment patriot act terror terrorism false flag grass roots media iraq iran war freedom constitution
|
Play |
|
|
Scott McClellan Questioned about Neocon Push for Iraq War
Please subscribe to Tom's
RepresentativePress channel:
http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=representativepress
Join RepPress Mailing List:
http://RepPress.com
Visit the NeoCon Zionist Threat blog:
http://NeoConZionistThreat.com
Must SEE Videos about Israel and 9/11 are here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BuTQ6ystWrw&feature=PlayList&p=7D2F342A1F2AEA82&index=0&playnext=1
Scott McClellan Questioned About NeoCons at the Barnes & Noble in Santa Monica, California 6/16/08
http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot.com/2008/06/scott-mcclellan-questioned-about-neocon.html
If you look at what Colin Powell said in Washington Post editor Karen DeYoung's biographical book about him. She had said that Colin Powell had conveyed to her that the "JINSA crowd," the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, which Dick Cheney is associated with, is control of the Pentagon and pushed us into Iraq and now is doing similar to get us to attack Iran.
Length: 172
Rating: 4.80 (106 ratings)
Tags: Scott McClellan What Happened Bush Book JINSA Neocon Zionist Colin Powell Dick Cheney Iraq War Iran Attack Ron Paul
|
Play |
|
|
WeAreChangeLA confronts Neo-Con David Frum
Stewart Howe and Jeremy Rothe-Kushel ask Neo-Con David Frum challenging questions.
-He is credited with the ideas for "Axis of Evil" speech. he originally called it "Axis of Hate"
-He wrote his last book before the one he's promoting now with PNAC "Prince of Darkness" Richard Perle called "An End to Evil"
-He announced in October of '07 that he was signing on to be the Ghouliani campaign's senior foreign policy advisor... even though he was trained in economics
-He comes from a family of journalists-both his mother and sister are respected journalists
- He drew inspiration for the "Axis of Evil" speech from FDR's "Day of Infamy" speech after Pearl Harbor
-At 14 he worked for a Socialist candidate until reading Solzhenitzyn's "Gulag Archipelago." This relates to the swinging reactionaries of the neo-con ranks (Irving Kristol, David Horowitz), many of whom were pretty hard-core Marxists when they were young. The swing from one extreme and tyrannical obsession to another.
-He saw Saddam's aggressive wars against Iran and Kuwait as resonant with Hitler and the Axis in WWII. So is it also resonant that as Prescott Bush aided the Nazis until his son helped take them out, H.W. aided Hussein until his soon took him out?
-He went to Yale-what does he think of secret societies and their influence on public life (JFK, Skull and Bones etc.)?
-Arianna Huffington, Gatekeeper Queen of the Progressive blogosphere will interview him
-He was on Jon Stewart and insulted Ron Paul
---------------------
Stewart Howe y Jeremy Rothe-Kushel preguntan a David Frum Neo-Con que desafÃa las preguntas.
-Él es acreditado con las ideas para "Eje de la Mal" discurso. él originalmente lo llamó "Eje del Odio"
-Él escribió su último libro antes el uno él promueve ahora con PNAC "PrÃncipe de la Oscuridad" Richard Perle llamó "Un Fin a la Mal"
-Él anunció en octubre de '07 que él contrataba para ser el consejero mayor de polÃtica exterior de campaña de Ghouliani... aunque él fuera entrenado en la economÃa
-Él viene de una familia de periodistas-ambos que su madre y la hermana son respetadas a periodistas
-El dibujó la inspiración para el "Eje de la Mal" discurso del FDR "DÃa de la Infamia" discurso después de Puerto de Perla
-En 14 él trabajó para un candidato de socialista hasta leer "Archipiélago de Gulag" de Solzhenitzyn. Esto relaciona a los reaccionarios que columpian de los grados neo-con (Irving Kristol, David Horowitz), muchos de quien fueron marxistas bastante extremos cuando ellos fueron joven. El columpio de un extremo y la obsesión tiránica a otro.
-Él vio las guerras agresivas de Saddam contra Irán y Kuwait como resonante con Hitler y el Eje en l Segunda Guerra Mundial. ¿Asà que es también resonante que como Prescott Bush ayudó a los nazis hasta que su hijo ayudara a quitarlos, H.W. ayudó Hussein hasta que su pronto quitara él?
¿-Él fue al Yale - Qué piensa que él en sociedades secretas y su influencia en la vida pública (JFK, etc. de Cráneo y Huesos)?
-Arianna Huffington, el Guardián Reina de la blogosfera Progresiva lo entrevistará
-Él estuvo en Jon Stewart y Ron Paul insultado
---------------------
WeAreChange.org
Infowars.com
ae911truth.org
wtc7.net
patriotsquestion911.com
9-11.meetup.com/359
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8172271955308136871&q=911+mysteries&total=1024&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
Footage shot by Katy Kurtzman. Editing by Bruno Bruhwiler. Music by SHUMONIK.
Length: 210
Rating: 4.50 (152 ratings)
Tags: david frum neocon axis of evil bill maher truth squad 911 treason traitor
|
Play |
|
|
A neo-con on neoconservatism
British commentator Douglas Murray spoke at the Hudson Institute in August 2006 on "why neo-conservatism still matters" (his latest is book is similarly titled "Neo-Conservatism: Why We Need It") Here's the transcript of this video excerpt:
Neo-conservatism is not a cabal or a party, but rather a sense, an instinct, a way of looking at the world. That way of looking at the world is in my definition a blend of idealism and realism. We look at the world as it is, but act in the world to make it as we would like it to be.
This makes our instincts different than traditional conservatives, who often distrust social engineering projects or any form of alteration of a status quo they perpetually see as being an irreversible if often quietly enjoyable decline. And of course, it makes us different from modern day liberals who simply don't see the world as it is. I say that neo-cons look at the world through an idealist's eyes, but wear heavy and powerful glasses. We're moralists with good eye-sight.
As such, I believe that neo-conservatism is the most valuable and indeed necessary political outlook of our time. I should point out here that I'm not terribly worried here about offending or alienating what you call liberals and I call socialists — people for whom in any case alienation-like self-flagellation seems to be a pleasure as well as a principle. But before offending conservatives any further, I would like to stress that I see old school conservatism not as wrong in itself, but largely, merely tactically wrong.
As primarily an instinct and almost a non-philosophy, old-style conservatism today has, to my mind, two major flaws. The first is that conservatism relies on a noble sense of loyalty to the status quo, but the status quo, as we know in much of the West today, has changed, especially in western institutions and thanks to socialist interferes, they've largely changed very much for the worst.
This being the case, the instinctive conservative is now often left trying to feel loyalty to a status quo that is not his status quo. That is, he's left trying to feel loyal to things which have not been loyal to him. I greatly sympathize with people caught in this dilemma. As an Anglican, I'm like many Anglicans today, left permanently caught between the desire to express loyalty to what one regards as a true faith, and at the same time, experiencing rage and bafflement at a church hierarchy which has thrown out the book of common prayer, the King James bible, and aspires, it often appears, to become like more than Greenpeace at prayer.
Length: 140
Rating: 3.60 (80 ratings)
Tags: neocon neoconservative conservative hudson institute Douglas Murray politicstv
|
Play |
|
|
The Rolling Stones - Sweet Neo Con
Personally i don't like this song.But the lyrics are refering to somebody we all know.Acording to Wikipedia:"Sweet Neo Con" is a controversial song from the 2005 Rolling Stones album A Bigger Bang.
The song became the focus of media scrutiny due to featured lyrics such as:
" You call yourself a Christian; I think that you're a hypocrite; You say you are a patriot; I think that you're a crock of shit "
Singer Mick Jagger initially denied the song's lyrics were aimed directly at U.S. President George W. Bush. In a September, 2005 interview with Rolling Stone magazine when he was asked "Who are you singing to?", Jagger replied, "I don't want to overexplain it. But it is very direct. During the presidential election, I was asked by the New York Daily News which side I was on. I said it's not polite to take sides in foreigners' elections. But we're not in an election now." Keith Richards was more cautious - "I didn't want this to be a diversionary storm, I thought potentially it would detract attention from the rest of the album and be seen as cheap publicity. We don't need that. But I told Mick, 'If you really feel like you want to say that, I'll back you all the way.'"
The song itself was primarily a Jagger composition, with Jagger performing vocals, harmonica, bass, and guitar with Richards, and with Charlie Watts on drums.
Length: 274
Rating: 5.00 (12 ratings)
Tags: the rolling stones sweet neo con controversial song hit bigger bang tour bush george mick jagger keith richards
|
Play |
|
|
Countdown "Special Comment" - December 6, 2007 - Neocon Job
"There are few choices more terrifying than the one Mr.. Bush has left us with tonight.
We have either a president who is too dishonest to restrain himself from invoking World War Three about Iran at least six weeks after he had to have known that the analogy would be fantastic, irresponsible hyperbole -- or we have a president too transcendently stupid not to have asked -- at what now appears to have been a series of opportunities to do so -- whether the fairy tales he either created or was fed, were still even remotely plausible.
A pathological presidential liar, or an idiot-in-chief. It is the nightmare scenario of political science fiction: A critical juncture in our history and, contained in either answer, a president manifestly unfit to serve, and behind him in the vice presidency: an unapologetic war-monger who has long been seeing a world visible only to himself.
After Ms Perino's announcement from the White House late last night, the timeline is inescapable and clear.
In August the President was told by his hand-picked Major Domo of intelligence Mike McConnell, a flinty, high-strung-looking, worrying-warrior who will always see more clouds than silver linings, that what "everybody thought" about Iran might be, in essence, crap. ..." - Keith Olbermann
Length: 514
Rating: 4.80 (221 ratings)
Tags: keith olbermann countdown special comment iran nuke george bush lied nie world war III
|
Play |
|
|
